Direct and Indirect Representation :: essays research papers

Direct and validating RepresentationLiving in a democratic society, we as Ameri potbellys relieve oneself the right to vote on just about all aspects of our lives. The votes that we devise either have a direct or an indirect office of our beliefs. In cases such as city and statewide laws, our beliefs are directly rangeed in all national and organizational matters our votes have an indirect impact. The stopping points are made by elect officials who we vote into office to represent our beliefs. One example of this indirect representation can be rig in any citywide school board where the elective members carry decisions on everything ranging from teacher employment to class curriculum. It is debatable whether, on situations as sensitive as class curriculum, we should be directly involved in such decisions or have them made for us by our elected officials. As we will find, however, class curriculum is something that must continue to be an indirect representation of the publi cs beliefs, rather than the direct expiry of a democratic vote.The people we have voted onto the school board were elected because they have the education and experience to make the decisions that the public is not capable to make. They try, to the best of their abilities, to represent us with their decisions, but no matter what thither will always be people who are not satisfied. In some instances the school board must make a decision which the majority of people will not agree with, but heretofore will benefit our children. Our representatives have done the research and the public has not, which is wherefore the public should not make judgement calls on the importance and relevance of certain materials and subjects within our school systems. An example of what happens when the public is allowed to decide can be found in the case of evolution vs. creationism. Some states have, in the past, outlawed the teaching of evolution because the public didnt agree with it, redden thoug h almost all scientists had accepted it. The children in school at that time were deprived of important information. There is no reason why a scientifically recognized subject should be banned from schools merely because the public doesnt agree with it.Our society is obligated to keep our citizens informed. A direct vote on class curriculum only perpetuates the former(a) generations perspective, as their children grow up to take their place.