Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Essay -- Government Political Ess

Domestic Politics and abroad Policy Although the aspirations and cultures of states atomic number 18 often motivated by external political pressures, analysis of new-made remote indemnity decisions demonstrates how internal political forces rout out play equally crucial roles in the pursuit and execution of these objectives. Thus, it would be invalid to claim that home(prenominal) authorities and the nature of regimes play shaver roles in either the goals a state pursues or the means it employs to apply them. By understanding how the diffusion of power in governments affect policy decisions, one can develop increased aw areness of the linkages that exist among the internal pressures of domestic politics and the external forces of foreign politics. Before discussing the furbish up of domestic politics on foreign policy objectives and their execution, one moldiness first understand the different types of policies that states pursue. The foreign policy of states can be dir ected toward the protection and enhancement of valued possessions (possession goals) or intend to improve the environment in which it operates ( milieu goals). More specifically, possession goals pertain to subject field possessions where states aim to enhance or preserve one or to a greater extent things they value such as territory, permanent membership in multinational organizations like the UN Security Council, or access to trade areas. And while milieu goals are different from possession goals in that states that work towards achieving them are not seeking to defend or increase their possessions but instead attempting to stamp conditions beyond their national boundaries, milieu goals can be seen as an corroboratory way of achieving possession goals. A nation that pursues a milieu goalsuch as the promotion of peace through the signing of multinational treatiesprovides clear benefits for the international community but ultimately serves to enhance its knowledge national sec urity by creating a safer environment where its national possessions are protected from external threats. But for many states, whether their foreign policy objectives dramatise the form of possession goals or milieu goals, the pursuit and execution of these goals are often constrained by the powers of domestic politics. And in the case of American foreign policy, the Constitution of the United States as well as recent history provides compelling support to this claim. American foreig... ...reted without reference to domestic politics or leadership. Realists argue that the interests of states transcend domestic politics and leadership revision because that the broad orientation of foreign and defense policies are unchanging. Although the realist model may be most appropriate for analyzing actions when vital interests are at punt such as in propagation of crises, it seems to have little instructive power for national security policy making in times without crisis. Although the aspirations and goals of states are often partially motivated by external pressures, it is weighty to recognize that internal forces also play equally crucial roles in the pursuit and execution of these objectives. The decisions of foreign policymakers must take into account domestic political considerations. This fact is especially evident in the political landscape of the United States, where the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branch allows intercourse to act as a counterweight to the power of the president. All states, whether their governments are democratic or authoritarian, must contend with domestic political considerations when evaluating foreign policy decision.